Introduction

Determining whether DNV accreditation is better than Joint Commission accreditation depends on various factors, including the specific needs and goals of an organization. Both DNV (Det Norske Veritas) and the Joint Commission are well-known accreditation bodies that assess and certify healthcare organizations.

Here are some points to consider:

Approach: DNV follows a risk-based approach that focuses on continuous improvement and patient safety. They emphasize a more holistic approach to accreditation, including a focus on clinical integration, patient-centered care and overall organizational performance. The Joint Commission, on the other hand, has a more traditional approach with specific standards and guidelines.

Integration of ISO Standards:  DNV incorporates ISO 9001 quality management principles into its accreditation process. This integration allows organizations to have a broader quality management system. The Joint Commission, while also emphasizing quality and patient safety, does not explicitly incorporate ISO standards into its accreditation process.

Survey Frequency: DNV accreditation has a three-year survey cycle, meaning organizations are surveyed every three years. The Joint Commission has a more frequent survey cycle, typically every 18 months. The longer survey cycle of DNV can provide more time for organizations to implement and monitor quality improvement initiatives.

Patient Safety Culture: DNV places a strong emphasis on developing a culture of safety within organizations. They require organizations to have processes in place for reporting adverse events, near misses, and implementing corrective actions. The Joint Commission also focuses on patient safety but may have a slightly different approach in terms of specific requirements and emphasis.

Cost and Resources: The cost associated with accreditation can vary between DNV and the Joint Commission, and it is important for organizations to consider their budget and available resources. Additionally, the level of support and resources provided by each accreditation body may differ, and organizations should evaluate what best suits their needs.

Conclusion

It’s worth noting that the choice between DNV and the Joint Commission for hospital accreditation may depend on factors such as organizational goals, resources, and regional preferences. Both organizations have credibility in the healthcare industry and can help healthcare organizations enhance their quality and patient safety practices. DNV takes a holistic approach to accreditation, focusing not only on compliance with specific standards but also on overall organizational performance and patient-centered care. This approach promotes a culture of continuous improvement and encourages organizations to go beyond minimum requirements.

If you are looking for assistance reaching your DNV accreditation goals, or are need a DNV Hospital Accreditation Documentation Package, contact our expert consultants to design, develop and implement ISO 9001 certification ready quality management systems from the bottom up to meet DNV Hospital Accreditation standards.

Author

Christina Gamache | Sales & Marketing Coordinator